Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.039
Filtrar
2.
N Z Med J ; 136(1579): 49-61, 2023 Jul 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37501244

RESUMO

AIM: The recently passed Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products (Smoked Tobacco) Amendment Act has the potential to profoundly reduce smoking prevalence and related health inequities experienced among Maori. This study examined support for, and potential impacts of, key measures included within the legislation. METHOD: Data came from Wave 1 (2017-2019) of the Te Ara Auahi Kore longitudinal study, which was conducted in partnership with five primary health organisations serving Maori communities. Participants were 701 Maori who smoked. Analysis included both descriptive analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: More Maori participants supported than did not support the Smokefree 2025 (SF2025) goal of reducing smoking prevalence to below 5%, and the key associated measures. Support was greatest for mandating very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs). Participants also believed VLNCs would prompt high rates of quitting. Participants who had made more quit attempts or reported less control over their life were more likely to support VLNCs. CONCLUSION: There was support for the SF2025 goal and for key measures that could achieve it. In particular, VLNCs may have significant potential to reduce smoking prevalence among Maori. As part of developing and implementing these measures it will be important to engage with Maori who smoke and their communities.


Assuntos
Fumar Cigarros , Povo Maori , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Povo Maori/estatística & dados numéricos , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/etnologia , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Produtos do Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Produtos do Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Fumar Cigarros/efeitos adversos , Fumar Cigarros/etnologia , Fumar Cigarros/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar Cigarros/prevenção & controle
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36901524

RESUMO

This study evaluates the association between smoking rates and mortality from circulatory system diseases (CSD) after implementing a series of smoking bans in Macao (China). (1) Background: Macao phased in strict total smoking bans since 2012. During the past decade, smoking rates among Macao women have dropped by half. CSD mortalities in Macao also show a declining trend. (2) Method: Grey relational analysis (GRA) models were adopted to rank the importance of some key factors, such as income per capita, physician density, and smoking rates. Additionally, regressions were performed with the bootstrapping method. (3) Results: Overall, smoking rate was ranked as the most important factor affecting CSD mortality among the Macao population. It consistently remains the primary factor among Macao's female population. Each year, on average 5 CSD-caused deaths were avoided among every 100,000 women, equivalent to about 11.45% of the mean annual CSD mortality. (4) Conclusions: After the implementation of smoking bans in Macao, the decrease in smoking rate among women plays a primary role in the reduction in CSD mortality. To avoid excess CSD mortality due to smoking, Macao needs to continue to promote smoking cessation among the male population.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Política Antifumo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Sistema Cardiovascular , China , Macau/epidemiologia , Política Antifumo/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência
5.
Science ; 378(6626): 1268-1271, 2022 12 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36548415
7.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34744091

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to clarify the transition to the implementation of smoking prohibition at eating and drinking establishments one year before and after April 2020, the time when they became "nonsmoking" in principle following the implementation of the amendment bill for the Health Promotion Act of Japan. METHODS: The total number of nonsmoking/smoking eating and drinking establishments by industry were obtained using the data from "Tabelog®." The number of people who tested positive for COVID-19 by the polymerase chain reaction test on the day of the survey nationwide and the bankruptcy status of the companies (eating and drinking establishments, etc.) for each month were ascertained. RESULTS: In 2020, a state of emergency was declared owing to the increase in the number of people positive for COVID-19, and many eating and drinking establishments went bankrupt. Despite these circumstances, the number of nonsmoking eating and drinking establishments exceeded that of smoking establishments in March 2020 and continued to increase thereafter. Additionally, the number of nonsmoking "restaurants" increased and exceeded that of smoking restaurants in June 2020. The number of nonsmoking "cafes" already exceeded that of smoking "cafes" at the beginning of this survey and continued to increase. The number of nonsmoking "bars" increased, but that of smoking "bars" remained high. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to promote measures against passive smoking while paying attention to the trends for different types of eating and drinking establishments, rather than considering all establishments together.


Assuntos
Política Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Restaurantes/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , COVID-19 , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Japão , Política Pública/tendências , Restaurantes/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0241512, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34460821

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tobacco policies, including clean indoor air laws and cigarette taxes, increase smoking cessation in part by stimulating the use of cessation treatments. We explored whether the associations between tobacco policies and treatment use varies across sociodemographic groups. METHODS: We used data from 62,165 U.S. adult participants in the 2003 and 2010/11 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) who reported smoking cigarettes during the past-year. We built on prior structural equation models used to quantify the degree to which smoking cessation treatment use (prescription medications, nicotine replacement therapy, counseling/support groups, quitlines, and internet resources) mediated the association between clean indoor air laws, cigarette excise taxes, and recent smoking cessation. In the current study, we added selected moderators to each model to investigate whether associations between tobacco polices and smoking cessation treatment use varied by sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, and health insurance status. RESULTS: Associations between clean indoor air laws and the use of prescription medication and nicotine replacement therapies varied significantly between racial/ethnic, age, and education groups in 2003. However, none of these moderation effects remained significant in 2010/11. Higher cigarette excise taxes in 2010/2011 were associated with higher odds of using counseling among older adults and higher odds of using prescription medications among younger adults. No other moderator reached statistical significance. Smoking cessation treatments did not mediate the effect of taxes on smoking cessation in 2003 and were not included in these analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic differences in associations between clean indoor air laws and smoking cessation treatment use have decreased from 2003 to 2010/11. In most cases, policies appear to stimulate smoking cessation treatment use similarly across varied sociodemographic groups.


Assuntos
/efeitos adversos , Política Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Uso de Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Análise de Mediação , Impostos/legislação & jurisprudência , Produtos do Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Estados Unidos
14.
Am J Public Health ; 111(3): 457-464, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33476232

RESUMO

In 2019, San Francisco, California, prohibited the sale of electronic cigarettes lacking US Food and Drug Administration authorization. JUUL then promoted a ballot initiative (Proposition C) to replace San Francisco's e-cigarette legislation with legislation JUUL wrote that required future legislation to be approved by the voters. JUUL promoted Proposition C as a way to reduce youth e-cigarette use while allowing adult choice.Health groups argued that JUUL's measure could nullify San Francisco's prohibition on selling flavored tobacco products. Health groups benefitted from having an established campaign network that recently defended the flavor ban. They successfully framed Proposition C as a tobacco industry ploy to undo San Francisco's e-cigarette regulations, particularly the prohibition on selling flavored tobacco products. JUUL ended its campaign on September 30, 2019, and the measure failed on election day, with 82% voting against it.Lessons learned from the campaign include the importance of framing an industry initiative as a threat to local public health lawmaking and the potential for the e-cigarette issue to attract parents as new leaders and engage a powerful constituency to support tobacco control measures.


Assuntos
Política Antifumo/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Produtos do Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Vaping/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Adulto , Comércio/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Saúde Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Pública , São Francisco , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Vaping/epidemiologia , Vaping/prevenção & controle
15.
Nat Med ; 27(2): 239-243, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33479500

RESUMO

Substantial global effort has been devoted to curtailing the tobacco epidemic over the past two decades, especially after the adoption of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control1 by the World Health Organization in 2003. In 2015, in recognition of the burden resulting from tobacco use, strengthened tobacco control was included as a global development target in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development2. Here we show that comprehensive tobacco control policies-including smoking bans, health warnings, advertising bans and tobacco taxes-are effective in reducing smoking prevalence; amplified positive effects are seen when these policies are implemented simultaneously within a given country. We find that if all 155 countries included in our counterfactual analysis had adopted smoking bans, health warnings and advertising bans at the strictest level and raised cigarette prices to at least 7.73 international dollars in 2009, there would have been about 100 million fewer smokers in the world in 2017. These findings highlight the urgent need for countries to move toward an accelerated implementation of a set of strong tobacco control practices, thus curbing the burden of smoking-attributable diseases and deaths.


Assuntos
Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Pública/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Política de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Política Pública/economia , Fumar/economia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/psicologia , Impostos , Organização Mundial da Saúde/economia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 23(4): 724-731, 2021 03 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33165535

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Smoking among young adults is often associated with social contexts and alcohol use. Although many countries, including New Zealand, have prohibited smoking inside licensed premises, outdoor areas have enabled smoking and alcohol co-use to persist. We examined whether and how outdoor bar areas facilitate and normalize young adult smoking and explored potential policy implications. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with 22 young adults who had recently smoked in a New Zealand bar or nightclub and investigated how physical design attributes (atmospherics) influenced experiences of smoking in outside bar settings. We used qualitative description to identify recurring accounts of the outdoor bar environment and thematic analysis to explore how participants experienced the bar in relation to smoking. RESULTS: Participants valued outdoor smoking areas that were comfortable and relaxing, and saw attributes such as seating, tables, heating, protection from inclement weather, and minimal crowding, as important. We identified four themes; these explained how participants used smoking to gain respite and make social connections, showed how bar settings enabled them to manage smoking's stigma, and identified potential policy measures that would decouple smoking and alcohol co-use. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence bar environments facilitate and normalize smoking among young adults questions whether smokefree policies should be expanded to include all bar areas. Introducing more comprehensive smokefree outdoor policies could reduce the influence of design attributes that foster smoking while also reframing smoking as outside normal social practice. IMPLICATIONS: Bar environments contain many stimuli that cue and reinforce smoking and integrate smoking into social experiences. Expanding smokefree bar settings to include outdoor areas would reduce exposure to these stimuli, decrease opportunities for casual smoking, help maintain young people's smokefree status, and support longer-term goals of sustained reductions in smoking prevalence.


Assuntos
Restaurantes/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Antifumo/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumantes/psicologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/análise , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Restaurantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Vasc Surg ; 73(5): 1759-1768.e1, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098941

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Active smoking among patients undergoing interventions for intermittent claudication (IC) is associated with poor outcomes. Notwithstanding, current levels of active smoking in these patients are high. State-level tobacco control policies have been shown to reduce smoking in the general US population. We evaluated whether state cigarette taxes and 100% smoke-free workplace legislation are associated with active smoking among patients undergoing interventions for IC. METHODS: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative database for peripheral endovascular interventions, infrainguinal bypasses, and suprainguinal bypasses for IC. Active smoking at the time of intervention was defined as smoking within one month of intervention. We implemented difference-in-differences analysis to isolate changes in active smoking owing to cigarette taxes (adjusted for inflation) and implementation of smoke-free workplace legislation. The difference-in-differences models estimated the causal effects of tobacco policies by adjusting for concurrent temporal trends in active smoking unrelated to cigarette taxes or smoke-free workplace legislation. The models controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, state, and year. We tested interactions of taxes with age and insurance. RESULTS: Data were available for 59,847 patients undergoing interventions for IC in 25 states from 2011 to 2019. Across the study period, active smoking at the time of intervention decreased from 48% to 40%. Every $1.00 cigarette tax increase was associated with a 6-percentage point decrease in active smoking (95% confidence interval, -10 to -1 percentage points; P = .02), representing an 11% decrease relative to the baseline proportion of patients actively smoking. The effect of cigarettes taxes was greater in older patients and those on Medicare. Among patients aged 60 to 69 and 70 to 79 years, every $1.00 tax increase resulted in 14% and 21% reductions in active smoking relative to baseline subgroup prevalences of 53% and 29%, respectively (P < .05 for both); however, younger age groups were not affected by tax increases. Among insurance groups, only patients on Medicare exhibited a significant change in active smoking with every $1.00 tax increase (an 18% decrease relative to a 33% baseline prevalence; P = .01). The number of states implementing smoke-free workplace legislation increased from 9 to 14 by 2019; however, this policy was not significantly associated with active smoking prevalence. At follow-up (median, 12.9 months), $1.00 tax increases were still associated with decreased smoking prevalence (a 25% decrease relative to a 33% baseline prevalence; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette tax increases seem to be an effective strategy to decrease active smoking among patients undergoing interventions for IC. Older patients and Medicare recipients are the most responsive to tax increases.


Assuntos
Claudicação Intermitente/terapia , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Produtos do Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Local de Trabalho , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Claudicação Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicação Intermitente/epidemiologia , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Formulação de Políticas , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Política Antifumo/economia , Política Antifumo/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/economia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Impostos , Produtos do Tabaco/economia , Produtos do Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Local de Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência
18.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 23(2): 341-348, 2021 01 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32810230

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Raising the minimum legal age (MLA) of tobacco sales from 18 to 21 (Tobacco 21 [T21]) has recently been implemented nationwide as a method to reduce tobacco use, but empirical data on youth knowledge of T21 policies and related pathways to tobacco use are limited. METHODS: Data were collected from the 2018 Kansas Communities That Care Student Survey. Knowledge of the MLA was compared between T21 and non-T21 regions using a quasi-experimental design. Logistic regression and mediation analysis were conducted to assess the association between knowledge of the MLA, influencing factors, and intention to use tobacco. RESULTS: Of 16 949 students (aged between 11 and 18) completing the T21 survey, fewer students responded correctly about the MLA in T21 than in non-T21 regions (37.4% vs. 46.3% responded correctly, 27.6% vs. 24.2% responded incorrectly, respectively). In T21 regions, Hispanics and students who support T21 were more likely to respond correctly about the MLA. Among current non-tobacco users in T21 regions, students who responded correctly about the MLA were less likely to report intention to use tobacco (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.6-0.8]) than those who responded incorrectly. The pathway from knowledge of the MLA to intention to use tobacco was significantly mediated by increased support for T21 (p = .002), perceived difficulty in accessing cigarettes (p = .042), and reduced susceptibility to peer influence (p = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the MLA was inversely associated with intention to use tobacco among youth. Educational campaigns to raise awareness and support for T21 among youth may improve the impact of T21 policies. IMPLICATIONS: This study examined youth knowledge of the MLA to purchase tobacco products, and whether knowledge of the MLA was associated with reduced intention to use tobacco. It also examined other influencing factors (eg, perceived support for T21) and potential mediation pathways linking knowledge of the MLA with intention to use tobacco. Given the nationwide adoption of T21, educational campaigns to promote knowledge of the policy may improve its impact.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Intenção , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Estudantes/psicologia , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Comportamento do Consumidor , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Kansas/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Tabaco/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
19.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 23(2): 402-406, 2021 01 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32770222

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Under the US Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has the authority to implement graphic warning labels (GWLs) on cigarette packages. Neither the original labels proposed by the FDA nor the revised labels include a source to indicate sponsorship of the warnings. This study tests the potential impact of adding a sponsor to the content of GWLs. METHODS: We recruited adult smokers (N = 245) and middle-school youth (N = 242) from low-income areas in the Northeastern US. We randomly assigned participants to view one of three versions of the original FDA-proposed warning labels in a between-subjects experiment: no sponsor, "US Food and Drug Administration," or "American Cancer Society" sponsor. We tested the effect of varying sponsorship on source attribution and source credibility. RESULTS: Compared to unsponsored labels, FDA sponsorship increased source attributions that the FDA sponsored the labels among both middle-school, largely nonsmoking youth and adult smokers. However, sponsorship had no effect on source credibility among either population. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that adding FDA as the source is likely to boost source credibility judgments, at least in the short term; though doing so would not appear to have adverse effects on credibility judgments. As such, our data are largely consistent with the Tobacco Control Act's provisions that allow, but do not require, FDA sponsorship on the labels. IMPLICATIONS: This study addresses the FDA's regulatory efforts by informing the possible design and content of future cigarette warning labels. Our results do not offer compelling evidence that adding the FDA name on GWLs will directly increase source credibility. Future work may test more explicit FDA source labeling and continue to examine the credibility of tobacco message content among high-priority populations.


Assuntos
Rotulagem de Produtos/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumantes/psicologia , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/psicologia , Produtos do Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Rotulagem de Produtos/métodos , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug Administration
20.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 21(12): 3449-3451, 2020 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33369438

RESUMO

Even though 90% of the world's population is covered by the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, it is estimated that only one-fifth (21%) and half (49%) of the countries that ratified this convention will achieve the target of reducing tobacco use by 30 % among men and women respectively in 2025. Over the past decade, there has been an increasing trend in the use of electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes for recreational use as well as smoking cessation. In concurrence with the increasing use of e-cigarettes among smokers of different age groups, nations have developed relevant national regulations on its sale, advertisement, packaging, product regulation, taxation, and surveillance. The countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region have also witnessed several legislations, at varying extent, related to the use of electronic cigarettes. However, the evidence on the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems remains scarce in the GCC region. Thus, further research on this emerging public health issue is warranted to generate the evidence necessary for the formulation of comprehensive tobacco control laws and effective prevention strategies.
.


Assuntos
Comércio/legislação & jurisprudência , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Produtos do Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Tabagismo/prevenção & controle , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Oriente Médio/epidemiologia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Tabagismo/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...